The notion of a post-scarcity world, where material needs are broadly met, is a significant concept to consider. It’s a future often depicted in fiction, suggesting a potential liberation from the pressures of obtaining basic necessities. However, reaching such a state involves more than just technological leaps; it’s deeply connected with human psychology, culture and societal structures. And given the rapid advancement of AI and automation, this is prompting fundamental questions about the nature of work and its role in our lives.

As AI and automation capabilities expand, they are increasingly able to perform tasks previously done by humans. Just look at the robots already working warehousing in Alibaba and coming soon to Amazon. This development challenges our conventional understanding of employment. It brings into our focus the existence of jobs that may be less fulfilling or add minimal value, sometimes termed “bullshit jobs.”, which consists of many people and by some estimates almost half of society’s jobs are in this category. The increasing potential for automation of such roles means we have to re-evaluate why we have historically linked individual identity and societal contribution so strongly to having a paid job.

This transition period, potentially leading to a state where fewer people are required for traditional labor, necessitates serious consideration of how societies will function and how individuals will support themselves.

Rethinking Economic Frameworks

In a world where the connection between labor and survival could be fundamentally altered by AI, our existing economic models may no longer be fully adequate. This has led to exploration and discussion of alternative systems:

One frequently discussed concept is Universal Basic Income (UBI). The premise here is straightforward: providing a regular, unconditional income to all citizens sufficient to cover basic needs. The argument is that this policy could provide a necessary social safety net in an age of increasing automation, ensuring that everyone has a baseline standard of living. Proponents suggest that with basic needs met, individuals would have the freedom to pursue education, community involvement, creative work, or other activities that benefit society and foster personal well-being, rather than being solely driven by the need to earn a living.

Beyond UBI, other models propose more fundamental shifts. A Resource-Based Economy, for instance, suggests organizing production and distribution based on the availability of resources and actual human needs, managed perhaps with the aid of advanced AI for optimal efficiency, rather than being dictated by monetary markets. Participatory Economics (Parecon) offers a decentralized model where economic decisions are made collectively by workers and consumers through democratic councils, a system that might be significantly aided by sophisticated AI in coordinating complex information. There are also Beyond Growth Models, which question the sustainability and desirability of perpetual economic growth, advocating instead for stable-state economies focused on ecological balance and quality of life, potentially facilitated by the efficiencies gained from AI.

These various models offer different approaches to managing a future of potential material abundance enabled by AI. They highlight the need to consider not just how much is produced, but how it is produced and distributed, and what values guide the economic system.

The Enduring Pursuit of Meaning

Even if material scarcity is significantly reduced, human needs for purpose, social connection, and personal development remain. AI can optimize logistics and perform complex calculations, but it does not fulfill the inherent human desire to contribute, to belong, or to grow.

In a future where automated systems handle many routine tasks, the opportunity could arise for individuals to dedicate more time and energy to these non-material aspects of life – building stronger communities, engaging in creative pursuits, or focusing on personal and collective well-being. The challenge will be to ensure that society provides the structures and support for people to find meaning and connection outside of traditional employment roles.

Navigating the Transition

Moving towards this potential future requires careful consideration and proactive engagement. Key areas for focus include:

• Re-evaluating Societal Values: Reflecting on our deep-seated beliefs about work, success, and contribution.
• Staying Informed: Understanding the ongoing developments in AI and automation and their potential impacts on various sectors.
• Exploring Policy Options: Seriously examining and debating potential economic and social policies, such as UBI and others, that could facilitate a smoother transition and a more equitable future.
• Prioritizing Human Well-being: Recognizing that the ultimate goal should be a society where technology enhances human lives and allows for the pursuit of fulfillment beyond material accumulation.
• Engaging in Dialogue: Participating in informed discussions about the opportunities and challenges presented by AI and the prospect of a post-scarcity future.

This is a complex transition, presenting both significant opportunities for human flourishing and potential challenges related to social structure and purpose. By thoughtfully considering the implications of AI and exploring new economic and social paradigms, we can work towards shaping a future that leverages technological progress to create a fairer and more meaningful existence for everyone.

---

Honestly surprised that post scarcity isn’t more of a thing in Star Wars. An idea for someone on the Star Wars team if you are reading. Meanwhile Andor season 2 releases tomorrow and I am ready for it.

References:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17rwvcQ8ADs&ab_channel=MarcusWerner
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMuDVAO57WE&ab_channel=IsaacArthur

Thanks for reading.